Friday, April 22, 2011

Virtual Women, Real Annoying

Probably not the woman of your dreams.
Hey fellas! Are you tired of dealing with actual women? Would you rather spend a nice evening at home chatting amiably with a tiny virtual woman who lives inside your computer instead? If so, would it be OK if instead of resembling any woman you’ve ever met in real life this tiny virtual woman instead acted as though she’d been designed by some dude who’s never actually spoken with a real woman? 

Also, I should add, if you chat her up cleverly enough, she’ll take off her virtual clothes and show you her virtual lady bits. 

If this all sounds like heaven to you, you may want to check out a little “game” called Virtual Woman Millennium Edition. A friend of mine found it on Download.com theother day, and naturally thought of me. The game, such as it is, allows you to create the woman of your dreams. As the game publisher, an outfit calling itself CyberPunk Software, put it: 


Virtual Woman users can build, talk, and compete against Virtual Women with full artificial intelligence. You choose their ethnic type, personality, location, clothing, etc


By “compete against,” the game makers mean, basically, that you chat with her until she either tells you to fuck off (you lose!) or she takes off her clothes (you win!). Sex, evidently, is something that women own, and the point of dating, for guys at least, is to sweet talk – or wheedle, or con -- the ladies into giving it to them. Women “win,” by contrast, when they force guys to listen to their inane blather without giving the poor schmucks even a glimpse of their titties. (I’d like to think that when my dates take off their clothes we both win.) 

I played the game the other night – or at least as much of it as I could stand. The first time, the game crashed before the conversation started. The second time, I played as a raging misogynist and offended my date by calling her a “whore” and a “cunt,” and she left in a huff. The third time, I chatted long enough to convince my date to remove her top. At which point real life asserted its demands, and I set the game aside, never to resume it.

Let’s just say that the conversations I had with each of these imaginary women were something less than sparkling. The woman who eventually took off her top blathered happily away about her hair for a few minutes, then segued into a conversation about how she hated going to new supermarkets because she wouldn’t know where to look to find the milk. She was shallow, silly, and self-absorbed, a virtual incarnation of every sexist stereotype of modern womanhood.  In other words, she seemed to come straight from MGTOW central casting. My “conversation” with her only lasted a few minutes, but it seemed to take forever. If real women were like this, I think even I would consider Going My Own Way. 

As one review on Download.com put it:  



the girls are just plane stupid, they … keep repeating themselves over and over again, and allot of what they say makes no sense, I say something to them, and they asked me some silly question that makes no sense, once I said what to one about something stupid it said that made so sense, just to see what it would do, and it said ( why are you so worried about me being what?) and it did that with other things I said to it too, its stupid, don't waist your time with this. 

That pretty much hits the nale on the hed. 

So many questions:

Were the makers of this game deliberately trying to make the women as annoying as possible, or do they think women are actually like this? Was the inanity of the conversation a bug – the result of shitty artificial intelligence programming  – or a feature? Probably a bit of both. 

More to the point: who could possibly enjoy a game like this? You’d have to have a pretty low opinion of women to be able to put up with the game’s casual misogyny. But if you hate women that much, why would you want to spend your evening talking to an imaginary woman about shopping and hair? 

Perhaps that’s why the publisher seems to have abandoned the game; the latest update on its web site is from 2008. 

As I’ve pointed out before, a small but significant number of “mansosphere” men are eagerly looking forward to the day when sex robots and/or “virtual” women will give men what they see as a real alternative to real women, thus putting supposedly spoiled “western” women in their place and destroying feminism to boot. One of the many fatal flaws in this scenario is that the only people who seem to be interested in making sexbots and VR women are guys who have no fucking clue what actual human women are like. But, hey, if it gets these guys out of the dating pool, that’s pretty much good news for everyone.



-- 

If you enjoyed this post, would you kindly use the "Share This" or one of the other buttons below to share it on Twitter, Facebook, Reddit, or wherever else you want. I appreciate it.

104 comments:

  1. Once again the interests of those who want VR men are completely ignored.

    Le sigh.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If those MGTOW guys actually had robot and virtual reality women, then they better hope the virtual women don't ever get artificial intelligence. As soon as that happens, even robots will reject those guys.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Good point about the personalities. Maybe they will just design one that has stereotypical male traits?

    ReplyDelete
  4. "That pretty much hits the nale on the hed." lol. :)

    Conversation is a very tricky thing to emulate, its no surprise these guys get it wrong. The easiest thing to do is to regurgitate stock phrases, perhaps trying to insert key words from the user's input. ELIZA did this to great effect, and managed to convince many people that it was a psychotherapist.

    This doesn't excuse the particular stock phrases that the programmers chose to use, nor the intent of the game to chat an AI's clothes off (cause thats how it works IRL).

    @Elizabeth: a stereotypical male would be too easy to emulate. :P

    User: Hello.
    VRMan: *takes clothes off*
    YOU WIN!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Hey everybody, misogynistman here. Oooo, I like that name. Anyhoo, I figured all you gals who own your sexuality, (cause it ain't a resource you use to garnish attention and/or material goods) would be pushing for VR sex and sexbots for men. I mean those guys are all losers anyway, right?

    ReplyDelete
  6. I played with a different execution of the same concept sometime last year. The funny thing about this one was that the developer claimed that she had some amazingly awesome super-convincing AI chatbot algorithms. Turned out she just repeated the same three "sexy" phrases over and over again. Thus conversations went something like this:

    ME: What, in your opinion, is the most important challenge facing our youth today?
    HER: I want to suck on that big throbbing cock of yours.
    ME: Okay... so... oral sex among teens?

    ReplyDelete
  7. Kirby: I should have been more specific-the female sex bots would have stereotypical male traits since these guys hate women but like boobies and other things.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Elizabeth: Fair enough, though now I'm picturing a Jersey Shore guy's personality in a woman's body... *shudder*

    ReplyDelete
  9. Kirbywarp, I can't believe you actually said this which can in no way be taken out of context..."This doesn't excuse the particular stock phrases that the programmers chose to use, nor the intent of the game to chat an AI's clothes off (cause thats how it works IRL)."

    Which would of course mean that a womans sexuality is her body and a mans sexuality is his ability to sweet talk a womans clothes off. In other words a man is visually turned on and a woman is verbally turned on. This is dangerous thinking, you're putting men and women into a box. Oh this is priceless when everyone proves me right AGAIN.

    Elizabeth, I can't help but think your comment was directed at me, I feel so wounded.

    ReplyDelete
  10. But seriously, back to sexbots and VR girls. I mean why not? I am actually interested in your thoughts on the andvancement and perfection of the sexbot. Kinda a refernce to silons from the original battlestar galactica.

    ReplyDelete
  11. NWO, I think kirby was being sarcastic there.

    ReplyDelete
  12. Ahh I see, that does seem to be the case all to often. Ya know what would be cool Dave? If when an evil misogynist like myself posted something Mozarts Reqieum played or something equally evil sounding. And when everyone else posted flight of the bumblbee played or something equally angelic.

    I mean ya gotta admit that would be cool.

    ReplyDelete
  13. (Note: nice ninja, David, and thanks. Thought I might as well still post a response)

    NWO: "Kirbywarp, I can't believe you actually said this which can in no way be taken out of context..."

    Should I congratulate you for doing the impossible then? My statements and intents:

    "This doesn't excuse the particular stock phrases that the programmers chose to use" - The programmers chose phrases that were vapid and shallow, possibly... I haven't played the game.

    "nor the intent of the game to chat an AI's clothes off" - it should be clear why this is misogynistic

    "(cause thats how it works IRL)" - sarcasm

    I'm kinda confused how you could take this and get anything about a what a person's sexuality is IRL, let alone that I want to put men and women into boxes. Feel free to clarify your reasoning. I'm all ears.

    ReplyDelete
  14. *laughs* That supposes those are stereotypical male traits but sure...

    ReplyDelete
  15. NWOslave: this may shock you but sometimes people say things that have nothing to do with you.

    And some of those people are female people and they still are not talking about you.

    ReplyDelete
  16. Reguardless of wether I missed the use of sarcasm due to my own dimwitted self, I seriously am more interested in everyones opinion of VR girls and more importantly sexbots. Which the Japanese seem to be pushing ahead full throtle with.

    As far as being misogynistic game, men do "chat womens clothes off in real life." I mean how else are they going to get to the good stuff? If I sit there and say nothing those clothes aren't going to just magically pop off.

    ReplyDelete
  17. NWO: I'm not going to tell you my opinion of sexbots because I'm 100-110% sure that you are just looking for ammunition to prove how horrible feminists are.

    And about your last paragraph: You really don't understand the concept of relationships, do you?

    ReplyDelete
  18. *makes a pair of breasts out of play doh* here NWOslave, now go away.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Wow, this game is stupid. At least "Dead or Alive: Beach Volleyball" had actual mechanics (even though it it's a bad game). This is just a chat simulation with a girl who is deep into uncanny valley.

    Another thing that's bothersome is that there are many examples in gaming that emulate this game to varying and horrifying degrees. Games like Heavy Rain, Metroid: Other M, Ninja Gaiden etc. try to have female game avatars bogged down with storylines and crap that make them absolutely nothing like women in real life. Even worse, these pathetic efforts are praised by the gaming industry and press.

    Ah, well, at least there's Ms. Pac Man, Final Fantasy, Super Smash Bros., Pokemon, Bejeweled, Tetris and even the original Metroid games. BTW, those games happen to be A LOT more popular than the aforementioned games with objectified chicks. I mean, who even remembers "Dead or Alive: Beach Volleyball"?

    ReplyDelete
  20. Now, now, cboye, how can you be sure I'm looking for "ammunition?" Besides, think of it as opportunity to further expose my backward thinking. Plus the mass media tells me women are superior debaters. I wouldn't stand a chance.

    Elisabeth, I prefer to make breats out of real dough, then I can bake them, watch them rise and eat them. I'm soo damn evil I scare myself.

    ReplyDelete
  21. Umm...because, based on every other thing you've ever said, your rudimentary cognition faculties only make it through enough words to identify a buzzword you can wank about?

    ReplyDelete
  22. cboye: its possible, just possible, that NWO has learned a little something about sarcasm, and is now exercising his newfound skill. :P

    I don't personally care that much about sex bots and VR girls. I've seen, and played, games similar to the OP. However, I also interact with real people on a daily basis, and recognize that the virtual women in those games are charicatures. Someone who is only exposed to those charicatures may find themselves unable to relate to, sympathize with, or understand real people. Therein lies the danger.

    ReplyDelete
  23. Kirbywarp, good answer, very well thought out. As most people don't have much free time these days "meeting" and relating to people gets harder all the time.

    My job flies my all over north america and I meet new people all the time, however since my work is done in dairies for the most part, the work needs completetion quickly. What usually happens is I'll work like 5 to 7 16 hour days in a row to finish a job. So meeting and forming any meaningful friendshio/relationship doesn't really happen.

    Even other more stationary jobs, you might meet only the same people day in and day out. So a sexbot for a lonely man unable to "talk it up" due to poor social skill would be able to meet his sexual needs. Kinda of like a mechanical pet.

    ReplyDelete
  24. Cboye, does my poor cognitive skills lead you to think less of me? Ahh well, so it goes.

    ReplyDelete
  25. We are exposed to these caricatures in movies. -__________- And advertisements. We're bombarded with them everywhere.

    ReplyDelete
  26. Okay I just finished trying it out and I totally take it back. This takes it to a whole new level.

    ReplyDelete
  27. DesertRose:

    Yes... Yes we are... Kinda depressing when you look at it that way.

    ReplyDelete
  28. NWO
    Perhaps if you spent half the time you do here trying to meet someone........

    Wouldn't work.

    ReplyDelete
  29. Well Kave, When I get home from my job I normally sleep for about 20 hours straight. Believe me when I say working 40 feet in the air for a week or two of 16 hour shifts can be mildly exhausting.

    And if my poor social skills and work schedule dooms me to a life of solitude what choice do I have? Sexbot? Am I simply unloveable? Deep questions.

    I was kinda hopin after 50 years of feminism my problems would be solved by feminists. I mean gender being a construct and all and women holding more employment than men. Alas women seem to still want boyfriends/lovers ect. that are better off than themselves. Thus as employment remains stagnant, it would seem that $19.00 an hour doesn't cut the mustard.

    According to the "theory" once women got the "power" they were supposed to ask guys out and offer to pay for meals and so forth. I have yet to meet a man, (and I've been all over North America) who has ever told of a woman doing any of these things.

    Ahh the poor slave, rotting away in solitude. Perhaps I'll get a sexbot when they come out and a dog for companionship, since I just don't measure up. Pity the poor slave, he has nothing to "offer."

    ReplyDelete
  30. NWOslave:

    If you are going to say that you travel and work so much that meeting people becomes impossible, then in the same breath state that you have met enough men to firmly state that no woman every asks a man out or pays for meals... well.. Perhaps you can see the contradiction. It would seem that the main place you would talk to men about this issue would be MRA forums, in which case its not surprising you can't find what you're looking for.

    I happen to know women who ask guys out and offer to pay for meals and so forth; my girlfriend is one of them. *shrug* Perhaps you should talk to more men than just the ones who congregate to complain about women...

    ReplyDelete
  31. Hmm... sexbots would really be that satisfying? I can only picture a computerized female voice, a la extra normal and a silicon-bag feeling thing: "oh.yes.do.that.again.yes.baby.yes.oh." & etc.

    Except for high school, all my lovers have gotten off as much (or more) on me getting off as well. Course, that's just my personal experience, and very small sampling, but still. With a sex-bot, you could never get that feeling of being a satisfying lover. Or are some men so convinced that women hate sex anyway that they don't care if they are good lovers or not?

    ReplyDelete
  32. Oh, and not that anecdotal evidence is worth a damn, but my lover isn't gainfully employed at the moment. (And didn't make as much as I did when we met) When we go out, I pick up the tab, movies, drinks, dinners, whatever. I don't mind, because I'd rather do dinner with him than alone. And I like treating him.

    ReplyDelete
  33. Kirbywarp...Always with the MRAs, since this blog specifically plucks comments from MRA sites wouldn't mine be everywhere if I frequented them? I mean in my obvious misogynist ways surely my posts would be everywhere.

    Forgive my scepticism at your assertation that women do indeed ask and pay for men, but I find this to be if nothing else a complete rarity, having never met a man of the thousands I've met who has had this happen.

    ReplyDelete
  34. Isn't this game just an even stupider version of "leisure suit Larry?"

    ReplyDelete
  35. NWOslave:

    Don't MRAs complain that David only picks and chooses the worst of the bunch? Perhaps you aren't trying hard enough? :P

    In any case, if my assumption that you visit these sites is incorrect, I'll happily take it back. I simpy find it hard to believe that not one man you've talked to (out of "thousands") has met the same kind of people that I see on a regular basis. *shrug* such is the fate of anectdotal evidence, I suppose.

    ReplyDelete
  36. P'raps it is a generational thing? My experience socially is strictly among the shiftless youth of the under-30 set, and we all pay each other for everything, boys, girls, groups, whateva. It all "comes out in the wash" as they say. And mostly we are poor.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Kestra:

    Possibly, perhaps probably. I myself fall under that under-30 category, as do my peers. Isn't it also said that progress happens when one generation dies off and a new one takes its place? It'd be interesting to know the ages of some of the MRAs David quotes.

    ReplyDelete
  38. @ Kestra

    That's the thing about the female sexbot fantasy: The MRA/MGTOW-types who root for it have such contempt for anything to do with women (even fictional things), that it's unlikely that a sexbot will satisfy them.

    Hell, given how much they scrutinize even FICTIONAL depictions of women (for example, the manboobz blog post displaying quotes of MRA's criticizing female action heroes as being "stupid" and "unrealistic"), it probably wouldn't be long before the female sexbots are tossed into trash heaps, upgrades and customization be damned.

    ReplyDelete
  39. NWO, I am a bisexual woman. Over the past few years, I have "asked out" several men (all of whom accepted). I frequently "treat" my dates and partners, regardless of their gender. If you don't know any independent, self-supporting women who are willing to pay for dates, then perhaps you're running with the wrong crowd.

    As to the "too busy to meet someone" conundrum...in all seriousness, have you considered on-line dating? As a first-year PhD student, I have an erratic and demanding work schedule, and few opportunities to meet people. I'm also profoundly socially awkward, to the point where I suspect that I may be somewhere on the autism spectrum.

    Finding a partner in "real life" seems hopelessly daunting to me. But I had no trouble finding a wonderful girlfriend on Okcupid--someone who's just as busy as I am, and who finds my awkwardness charming. And yes, she pays for things herself.

    I do think you need to make some MAJOR adjustments to you attitude and behavior before you're likely to get a date with a self-respecting woman. But being busy and awkward, by itself, doesn't mean you're doomed to eternal solitude.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Kirbywarp, I do frequent the MRA blogs and their ages vary from top to bottom, and I have posted there. Probably my posts weren't quite misogynist enough to make the cut. Maybe they weren't misogynist at all. Cha right.

    Just out of curiosity, not that I know if it's true or false, but did you ever wonder if those really awful, hateful comment were a plant? Stranger things have happened.

    Also couldn't this same tactic be used by the State? Such as identify and magnifying a problem that doesn't really exist? Offering to open an agency to "investigate" the problem. Then finding a problem, then "offering" more "security" to rectify the situation. Of course when I say "offer" I mean to tak the people for said service. I'm guessing the only way to increase revenue to these "agencies" would be to continually "find" new problems. Just a little food for thought.

    ReplyDelete
  41. Well Simone Lovelace, being purely straight and my job normally takes me all over, plus the fact that dating sites run at about 4 or 5 to 1 men v women, I'd guess that kinda answers that.

    More than likely I'll end up marrying a woman from the phillipenes/mexico where my value is increased. As what I have to "offer" in monetary value is far less in the US than elsewhere. You see I prefer a long term relationship not just fun sex.

    ReplyDelete
  42. NWOslave:

    I've seen forums deal with something similar to this, known as Poe's Law, which I'm sure you've heard about. Groups tend to "know their own" so to speak, and therefore "fake" commments can reliably be ousted (take FeministTrollQueen for example) unless they align with the group's mentality.

    As far as I'm aware, and you should be as well, the comments appearing on this blog usually are upvoted considerably, with opposing statements downvoted into oblivion. Based on the evidence, I'd say these comments are real.

    I don't take conspiracy theories very seriously, since they almost always start with a conclusion and find any means possible to support it, rather than putting evidence first. If you're implying that somehow feminists are planting and magnifying misogyny to be able to "offer" more... what, equality? The very second the feminist movement tries to install some sort of matriarchy, you can rest assured that I would stand right beside you denouncing feminism and its goals. But, and I'm sure this is a quote from somewhere, "it just ain't so."

    ReplyDelete
  43. NWO, for what it's worth, I've had better luck on Okcupid as a women seeking women than I ever did as a woman seeking men. While there's a huge surplus of men on most dating sites, a massive percentage of those men are--as far as I can tell--just trolling, or they're douchebags who like asking strange women for pictures of their tits. So if you can get yourself to a place where you don't come across as a troll or a douchebag (which won't be easy, but is probably possible), your chances are much better than you might think.

    ReplyDelete
  44. But my larger point is this: you're dateless, and you're unhappy, but you don't seem to be doing anything about it. Yeah, I know, it's tough, but you're not even trying. And until you have (a) changed your attitude enough so that a self-respecting woman might possibly want to date you and (b) made some kind of good-faith effort to get yourself a date, then I have precisely zero sympathy for you. And I imagine that most of my fellow commenter feel the same way.

    ReplyDelete
  45. He doesn't try to do anything about it because that would require changing himself, which takes real effort. Much easier to sit back and blame feminism and women in general.

    ReplyDelete
  46. Noble words Kirbywarp, however as everyone knows women these days recieve the lions share of college degrees, Yet just a little over a week ago Title IX just tripled it's power.

    Since women now obtain a mojority of college degrees why is Title IX growing? Since 1913 no State agency has shrunk. You're fooling yourself if you believe AA, Title IX or any other agency will "go away." Marxism doesn't work that way. The hatred must be promoted and expanded.

    Do you really believe a State agency that is pulling down billions of dollars every year is going to say, "well, theres no more need for Title IX, everybody gets these tax dollars back." If every man and woman got together and said well theres no more "oppression" of women in college. Every media paper, TV, billboard outlet would have front page news of rampant rape, sexism and oppression. They would blare every firehouse siren, they would bring back morse code to get the message out of men oppressing women.

    Make no mistakes, they, the media, corporations and State work together. They are your enemy. You have far more to fear from the State who in the guise of "caring" about your oppression than any MRA. When "they" empower you with a "right" that you believe "helps" you, they weaken us all. Believe me they know exactly what their doing. Know your enemy.

    ReplyDelete
  47. So when men design virtual women, they intentionally make them shallow, vapid, and stupid, huh? No wonder they have so little success with real women...we just don't tend to have those traits I guess. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  48. Oh and of course he can plan to take advantage of the financial insecurity of some woman from another country. I've seen pathetic specimens like that in one of my old jobs; these guys who make sure their new wives learn little English, have no independent social lives and are pretty much totally dependent on these meatbags to survive. Disgusting, really.

    ReplyDelete
  49. Yes, NWOslave, I'm sure any Filipino woman would be honored to be approached by a guy that can't even be bothered to spell the name of her country right.

    Where his "value" has increased? Translation: Where he assumes women have no standards.

    ReplyDelete
  50. Simone Lovelace, I can get dates and sex. My attitude is just fine.

    Just out of curiosity, why should "I" have to change. Are we assuming "I" am broken. It seems passing odd that the consencus is "I" and many men, particularly MRAs need to change. Are women and particularly feminists "perfection" No "change" is needed.

    Are we again back to the slave is broken. What "changes" do I need to make to myself? This is one of the problems with the "movement." I assure you I'm quite fine just the way I am. If men are "supposed" to accept women for the people they are without change, I demand equality.

    ReplyDelete
  51. Wait...so first no woman wants you because you're not rich and we're all gold-digging bitches, now you can get laid any time you want. Okay player. But let's ignore the fact that your story (on this, and everything else) keeps changing. We'll assume that you're able to attract dates and f*ckbuddies, but can't seem to land a solid relationship, and go from there.

    What's wrong with your attitude is that, well, you're incredibly obnoxious. This is not a political statement, or even a particularly feminist one.

    Is there a straight or bisexual woman in the house who does not find NWOslave at least slightly irritating? Would you please stand up?

    ReplyDelete
  52. Out of curiosity, what is this event that happened that "tripled Title IX's power," NWOslave?

    This may be by own ignorance, but is Title IX an agency? I thought it was a law that mandated equality amongst gender...

    The rest is unimpressive. Assertion after assertion goes nowhere in supporting your claim, and just makes you out to be a kook.

    ReplyDelete
  53. I'm not taking "advantage" of anyone, I simply can't afford the lifestyle demanded of me in this country for a long term relationship.

    Again my spelling dooms me as "not good enough." Perhaps my Filipino wife will overlook my countless flaws. They certainly aren't overlooked by the perfect ones here.

    Ahh the slave simply has no value. Funny thing is if I program a sexbot to be shallow, vapid, and stupid, these are all the things you claim I am.

    Also isn't a vibrator, which women constantly remind men they can never keep up with, nothing more than a....."robot" I mean it's a mechanical device designed to give you pleasure, right? And of course it's "good" when a woman uses her "robot" for pleasure. Her "robot" is better than a man. Well why is a mans robot bad? Why is he a loser? He can't get any? Does my value as a man hinge on a womans approval?

    ReplyDelete
  54. You know, NWO, I sympathize.

    I mean, it's not like poor men ever get married, you know?

    Also, I know that one I got a vibrator, I totally lost interest in partner sex, let alone relationships.

    Oh wait! Both those statements are the opposite of true.

    ReplyDelete
  55. http://thebrandeishoot.com/articles/10159

    Kirbywarp, Here is the event that took place by Title IX. Beyond a reasonable doubt has been replaced for men with preponderance of evidence. Which means in a he said she said case, her word IS the evidence. Title IX is now ABOVE the law, no police investigation is needed. Title IX will now be it's own police force and watchdog

    This goes against every LAW in the books. Now where do your loyalties stand and your high and mighty words of denouncing this travesty of justice. Or is it just "silly."

    ReplyDelete
  56. Five minutes after the first working sexbot is invented, MRAs will be going online to bitch about how lazy and selfish their sexbots are, and how their sexbots think they're so perfect but they're totally not all that, and they're just leeching off humans for batteries. Ultimately they will all vow to buy cheap black-market sexbots from Russia but never actually do it.

    ReplyDelete
  57. Tell me now did Title IX expand it's State powers by promoting hatred, or did it go away because women get the lions share of college degrees? You see when something is a fact it is no longer a "conspiracy." And when a man can be incarcerated on a womans word alone, he lives in a Marxist police State.

    ReplyDelete
  58. Oh yes, one other thing that wasn't mentioned in this Pro Title IX article, prattling off the many lies of which they're not held accountable for. The accused (man) does not have the right to face his accuser (woman).

    I guess if you're a man it might seem a tish unfair. However being the oppressed/privileged woman it probably seems like a pretty good deal.

    I can see a lot of "good" coming out of this gem. Dontcha think?

    ReplyDelete
  59. Right, because nobody ever ends up incarcerated on a man's word alone.

    Also, for a marxist police state, we seem to have an awful lot of rich folks wandering around alive and with their wealth conspicuously non-redistributed. Just sayin'.

    ReplyDelete
  60. oh my NWO. I am beginning to pity you. I have been following your comments here for days as I lurk the comments. The way you twist, changing your story for each new challenge is quite sad. You dont know who you are do you? I hope you can learn to see yourself as others see you and learn to like what you see. Then you will be able to attract a woman just like you'd like.
    back to lurking.

    ReplyDelete
  61. I guess this gives you just one more choice in the myriad of choices you already have. Will you stand with men like myself against a Marxist State or will you stand with the Marxist State against men. Because sooner or later, a man, (not me of course) but one you respect will be hollabacked into prison.

    ReplyDelete
  62. also David, I've been lurking happily for weeks now. This place is the bomb!
    Owllizard

    ReplyDelete
  63. To many numbered poster, The hubris of believing my value as a man is dependent upon my attraction to a women is staggering.

    ReplyDelete
  64. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  65. (edited for spelling)
    NWOslave:

    You might be interested in the usage of "Preponderance of the evidence" in other areas. Its primary use, according to that paragon of truth wikipedia, is in civil cases. Thus a domestic dispute or some such would be resolved in the same way that sexual harrassment cases will now be handled.

    Interestingly I haven't heard you complain about all of civil court cases.. Perhaps I shall hear from you soon? In any case, it most certainly does not go against "every LAW in the books."

    ReplyDelete
  66. I wonder...does Blogger have an "ignore" function?

    ReplyDelete
  67. "The hubris of believing my value as a man is dependent upon my attraction to a women is staggering."

    Misusing fancy-pants words like "hubris" certainly doesn't add to your value as a man.

    Your "value" (whatever that is) as a man IS dependent upon your attractiveness to women.

    Your "value" as a human being is dependent upon your accomplishments (of which I gather you have none), your intelligence (yours being very low) and your personality (yours being devoid of empathy and full of self-aggrandizing anger). Clearly, your value as a human being is at sewer level. The fact that it's reflected in women's lack of interest in you isn't hubris -- it's an entirely expected consequence.

    ReplyDelete
  68. But Captain Bathrobe, you'd miss out on so much fun! :D

    ReplyDelete
  69. NWO says "Well Kave, When I get home from my job I normally sleep for about 20 hours straight. Believe me when I say working 40 feet in the air for a week or two of 16 hour shifts can be mildly exhausting"

    Didn't you say you worked 17 hour shifts on the last thread you bowed out on... after commenting all day for two days from 40 feet in the air as a... machine designer!

    Somethings you should keep in mind the next time you pretend to be someone you're not. While your posting here and working at the same time.

    People that actually work with Cad, call it Cad. People that look it up on the internet call it by it's full name... I guess from your rather pathetic need to feel like you've built something.

    (CAD is a program that allows you to 3d model designs for industrial products instead of literally carving them out of wood or metal)


    An industrial designer, a tool and die maker, or an industrial engineer etc. One person can be all but none of them call themselves a machine designer.

    ReplyDelete
  70. Kirbywarp said...

    But Captain Bathrobe, you'd miss out on so much fun! :D


    It used to be fun, but now it's just tiresome. I'm actually starting to miss some of our other trolls.

    ReplyDelete
  71. Kirbywarp, Yes indeed it is used, quite recently in DV and now "sexual harrassment" in college and of course restraining orders.

    And what do all these things have in common. I believe it's a womans word versus a mans word. And where does this "preponderance of evidence" rest? Ahh, of course, a womans word is gospel a mans word is.......?

    I'm gonna go out on a misogynist limb here. I gotta be totally honest with ya, I find it mildly unsettling that I can be evicted from my home, kicked out of college, incarcerated and placed on the sexual offenders registry on any womans word. But hey, you know misogynist me. Afraid to lose my privilege.

    ReplyDelete
  72. No Kave I said that was my previous job, of which I added those jobs were shipped overseas due to quotas. Try and keep up.

    ReplyDelete
  73. NWO

    Your expecting that the crowd will not know much about industry.

    I was following my families tool and die, and pattern makers around like Gods since I could walk. It is my PRIVILEGE that they had to put up with me.

    What have you really learned in your life?

    ReplyDelete
  74. Yeah, fuck this shit. I'm going to 4chan.

    ReplyDelete
  75. I'm just trying to understand when it is you sleep NWO.

    Your previous job which is really not a job?

    ReplyDelete
  76. Please tell me how I misused a word amused? Haughty, prideful, arrogant. Yea I'm pretty sure I used it correctly

    ReplyDelete
  77. Or work.. when is it you have time for work?

    Again... math skills NWO.

    ReplyDelete
  78. Tool and Die makers are good at their trade but make poor machinists, and vise versa.

    I'm afraid I only do 2d autocad, ooops I mean cad. You see when I took cad 3d was in its infancy.

    And really you come from a family of tool and die makers. Gee I saw a Zebra once at the zoo, so now I'm an expert. You don't know anything about machining. Your father and brother worked, not you.

    ReplyDelete
  79. 18 hours a day on forums.... 17 or hours a day at work depending on the mood now 20 feet up.

    That's quite a accomplishment NWO

    ReplyDelete
  80. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  81. In fact Kave I could make up words about design or machining, or really anything in manufacturing and you'd have to google it and hope wikipedia tossed you some useful info.

    Comical, have you ever even done an honest days labor in your life? Doubtful.

    ReplyDelete
  82. Thats 40 feet up Kave, again keep up.

    ReplyDelete
  83. NWOslave:

    Ahhh... Now we get to the heart of the matter. You are absolutely convinced that in our society all a woman has to do is snap her fingers and the man will be sent packing.

    Care to give one example of a case where, on a woman's word alone, a man was "evicted from [his] home, kicked out of college, incarcerated and placed on the sexual offenders registry?" If not, then its yet another baseless assertion that only convinces others that you are delusional.

    ReplyDelete
  84. When does your work week start NWO?

    And yes.. you did google it.

    ReplyDelete
  85. It sounds like NWO is one of those older technicians whose training is now all obsolete (his cad certainly seems to be) and who is now slinging blame at whoever he can for his own lack of relevance: blaming other demographics for stealing his job, blaming employers or the workplace for not recognizing the value of his obsolete skills, etc.

    He may well be unemployed or underemployed, which would explain his inconsistent descriptions of his work situation and his ability to be online at all hours.

    ReplyDelete
  86. In the porn thread on April 21, NWO posted at the following times:

    11:41 AM
    11:54
    12:39
    12:48
    1:01 PM
    1:29
    1:37
    1:39
    1:46
    1:54
    1:59
    2:18
    2:24
    2:40
    2:56
    3:03
    3:09
    3:20
    3:50
    4:10
    4:15
    4:55
    5:02
    5:07
    5:15
    5:21
    5:23
    5:31
    5:33
    5:36
    5:43
    5:45
    5:48
    5:54
    5:57
    6:06
    6:10
    6:13
    6:19
    6:25
    6:28
    6:30
    6:36
    6:48
    6:55
    6:57
    7:06
    7:13
    7:16
    7:20
    7:28
    7:57
    8:23
    8:27
    8:31
    8:38
    8:42
    8:50
    8:53
    8:59
    9:04
    9:11

    Dizzying, isn't it? As you can see, that's 10 1/2 hours of constant commenting with no breaks longer than 40 minutes. No 17-hour workday here, and this was on a Thursday.

    Compare that with my comments, for instance, and you'll see that I may post several times in succession in the evening, but then I'll be offline for a good 18 hours for sleep and work.

    ReplyDelete
  87. I did not remark at all on "your value as a man". I did remark on your self awareness, which as you once more demostrate is very weak. Once you beome solid in yourself, you will find you attract better women (which you have been complning about often)but also better friends, employment, and all other things that make life good. Until then you will continue to miss the mark. At this point this blog is functioning as therapy for you and may result in happy progress.
    (You probably want to look up hubris as well.)
    Nighty night all. keep up the good fight.

    ReplyDelete
  88. Night b-string (sorry, I like the sound). Though it does seem as if the fight is over. Perhaps NWO is taking one of his rare 20 hour hibernations?

    ReplyDelete
  89. Bob fucking Dobbs, NWO, what is your purpose in being here exactly? What psychological need does it fulfill? Do you feel like a brave hero facing the slings and arrows of outrageous feminism? What?

    ReplyDelete
  90. Attention, pure and simple.

    When NWO posts on the MRA forums he's probably ignored, because he's just one more voice echoing the same sentiments. When he posts here he's guaranteed a response because his tone is so obnoxious.

    So he gets the attention he seeks - and I guess also some sense of superiority, as he's already decided everyone who posts here has been brainwashed by the new world order feminist conspiracy and are therefore less intelligent than he is. In his mind he's toying with us, not the other way around.

    (I took Armchair Psychology 101 so I know this stuff.)

    ReplyDelete
  91. A bunch of comments ago-- NWOaf, the male equivalent of a vibrator is a fleshlight. I highly support all men buying a fleshlight and all women buying a vibrator. Sex toys for all!

    Robots, however, seem to fulfill an emotional need, not just a make-masturbation-feel-better physical need.

    ReplyDelete
  92. Wow, seeing how NWO twists his story again and again, just to see commenters squirm, is quite a learning experience.

    And by learning experience, I mean: UGH.

    ReplyDelete
  93. Seriously Dave, much as I enjoy this site, and read it every day, now that NWOaf has moved in all his stuff, and settled in with his laz-e-boy recliner to hold court for hours and hundreds of posts a day, I'm out of here.

    ReplyDelete
  94. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  95. NWOslave, more than twelve hours and thirty comments later, not a single person has contested my assertion that you are an incredibly annoying person, and that that's at least part of why you can't find love.

    Just sayin'

    ReplyDelete
  96. NWO starts posting first thing in the morning, goes all day, posts some bullshit about how busy he is and how evil women are, then slithers away once the questions come too fast.

    Sounds like an older guy who can't afford a trip to Thailand to buy a woman.

    ReplyDelete
  97. I propose that we just ignore the goomba.

    Off topic: has anyone read the Liz Jones piece (I refuse to direct link to the Daily Fail) that's making the rounds on all the feminist blogs? I do believe that we've finally found the elusive sperm-stealing, gold-digging feminazi of myth.

    ...oh wait, she's explicitly opposed to feminism and is a conservative colluder. Never mind, my bad. Guess the boogeywoman is still relegated to the shadows of the imagination.

    ReplyDelete
  98. I read a part of it. She was pretty effed for doing what she did. Feministe had a good breakdown of what she was wrong and so was he.

    ReplyDelete
  99. NWO Slave

    I am a CNC Machinist for about 6 years now and two things are evident. People who are real Machinists don't consider "knowing CAD/CAM" as being an actual Machinist. Hands on, getting dirty, being able to machine parts either manually OR on a CNC with or without CAD/CAM software is a person who can call themselves a Machinist.

    The average Machinist who is properly trained (either by a trade school or through their work) laughs at the types who sit around diddling with software (but don't actual set-up, run, or use the programs) as office-lackeys. Not Machinists.

    If you can't make a part with your own two hands without the aid of a computer guiding you....you are far from a Machinist.

    ReplyDelete
  100. NWO did you ever consider that the reason women don't want to date you is because you don't actually respect them? You are too busy making judgements about them and pushing them into tiny little boxes because you lack the ability to empathize and understand other people, further I would second ozy's statement of a fleshlight. The difference between a vibrator or it's male equivalent the fleshlight and a sexbot is that sexbots are actually designed to be pretend people. Women are very well aware that their vibrators are toys, where the current sexbot owners treat their sexbots as their girlfriend.

    ReplyDelete
  101. I've never heard of women considering their vibrators to be "the same as/better than men" or whatever the claim here is.

    More commonly, you hear women saying that their vibrator is simply faster and more efficient (which is quite logical).

    I don't think I've ever heard a woman comparing her vibrator to her relationships and interactions with a human male. And certainly not as a replacement for one.

    ReplyDelete
  102. Ladyraine, exactly. I'm not mocking anyone who uses sex toys, just those who think these toys are somehow a replacement for an entire gender.

    Island, NWO will get tired and move on.

    ReplyDelete
  103. NWOSlave:

    You know, here's the thing: the fact that your handle includes "NWO" tells me that you are absolutely not to be taken seriously under any circumstances. The fact that you casually throw around the term "Marxist" reinforces that.

    Just sayin.

    ReplyDelete
  104. @BrianX, well there is that. At least he does not super ironically throw around the term "big brother" in his anti-marxist rants. That one always gets at me.

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Sociable

ShareThis