Friday, November 5, 2010

Further Reading: Domestic Violence

Another addition to my "Further Reading" series. See here for an explanation.

This one is about Domestic Violence.

I'd recommend starting with my debate posts on DV, which offers an extensive list of links to academic and government studies and useful overviews.

For additional reading:


Michael Flood: Claims about husband battering

Men in fathers' rights groups and men's rights groups have been claiming very loudly for a while now that domestic violence is a gender-equal or gender-neutral phenomenon - that men and women assault each other at equal rates and with equal effects. They claim that an epidemic of husband-battering is being ignored if not silenced. ...

There are four problems with the claims about 'husband battering' made by men's rights advocates. Firstly, they only use these authors' work selectively, as the authors themselves disagree that women and men are equally the victims of domestic violence. Secondly, they ignore the serious methodological flaws in the Conflict Tactics Scale. Thirdly, they ignore or dismiss a mountain of other evidence which conflicts with their claims. Finally, their strategies in fact are harmful to men themselves, including to male victims of violence.
Michael Flood: Domestic Violence: Encyclopedia of Men and Masculinities:
Men’s physical violence against women is accompanied by a range of other coercive and controlling behaviors. Domestic violence is both an expression of men’s power over women and children and a means through which that power is maintained. Men too are subject to domestic violence at the hands of female and male sexual partners, ex-partners, and other family members. Yet there is no ‘gender symmetry’ in domestic violence, there are important differences between men’s and women’s typical patterns of victimization, and domestic violence represents only a small proportion of the violence to which men are subject.

Finally, A Feminism 101 blog: But doesn’t evidence show that women are just as likely to batter their partners as men?

A: No. This is an often repeated claim based on either faulty understanding or outright misrepresentation of a few studies made using the CONFLICT TACTICS SCALE (CTS) or similar self-report surveys. One of the authors of the original study, Richard Gelles, categorically rejects this interpretation of his research. ... Women are self-reported to be just as likely to strike their partners as men are, but they are not just as likely to batter their partners as men are. That is a crucial distinction.

Alas, a blog: On “Husband-Battering”; Are Men Equal Victims?

[T]here isn’t sex equality in serious violence. Women are battered by their intimate partners much more often than the reverse. Given the many reasons to doubt the CTS’s accuracy for measuring severe violence in families, the most reasonable conclusion is that the Straus/Gelles studies – at least, as they’re used by men’s rights activists – are inaccurate.

So should the Straus and Gelles studies be rejected entirely? I say no. The evidence weighs strongly against the “equal victimization” hypothesis, but that doesn’t mean the results of CTS-based studies should be thrown out entirely. Although it’s clear the Straus/Gelles work doesn’t accurately measure the most severe instances of intimate violence, the validity of the CTS in measuring what Michael Johnson calls “common couple violence” – minor, sporadic, non-escalating and mutual violence between spouses – has not been disproved.

Department of Justice: Measuring Intimate Partner (Domestic) Violence

A important discussion of the "women commit equal violence" myth:

Are Men and Women Equally as Likely to Be Victims or Offenders?

The National Family Violence Survey (NFVS) found nearly equal rates of assault (11–12 percent) by an intimate partner among both men and women. ... NIJ researchers have found, however, that collecting various types of counts from men and women does not yield an accurate understanding of battering and serious injury occurring from intimate partner violence. National surveys supported by NIJ, CDC, and BJS that examine more serious assaults ... clearly find more partner abuse by men against women.

For example, NVAWS found that women are significantly more likely than men to report being victims of intimate partner violence whether it is rape, physical assault, or stalking and whether the timeframe is the person's lifetime or the previous 12 months. [3] NCVS found that about 85 percent of victimizations by intimate partners in 1998 were against women. ...

A review of the research found that violence is instrumental in maintaining control and that more than 90 percent of "systematic, persistent, and injurious" violence is perpetrated by men. [8] BJS reports that 30 percent of female homicide victims are murdered by their intimate partners compared with 5 percent of male homicide victims, and that 22 percent of victims of nonfatal intimate partner violence are female but only 3 percent are male. [9]

Domestic violence and gender - An XY collection

Links to an assortment of important and useful studies.The Kimmel paper is especially helpful.

9 comments:

  1. Studies by feminists that mandate proof that there is a bad group and a good group or the existence of patriarchal abuse theory are no different from christian studies that prove creationism. Feminists can have those studies, at the end of the day, to anyone who is outside the ideology, the papers that describe the methods that feminist researchers use to hide symmetry and the studies that are carried out by legitimate researchers trump feminist studies.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Intellectual coward ducks debate once again

    ReplyDelete
  3. Manhood academy: When you spam my comments section with dozens of versions of the very same message, which violates my rather tolerant comments policy, those comments are going to either get caught by the spam filter or simply deleted.

    You posted one version of your comment that didn't violate my comments policy, and that one is up, in whichever topic you posted it in.

    ReplyDelete
  4. david got raped by Paul Elam in the Debate... and his momma.

    ReplyDelete
  5. You have incredible patience and tolerance, David.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Cristine

    Feminist oppression of victims of domestic abuse and its defense of its discriminatory abuse industry is hardly tolerant. Hell, feminists suppress victims of female pedophiles.

    Tolerance on this issue would be a non judgmental, not discriminatory abuse industy.

    The fact is that the politically correct cant tell the difference between right wrong on this one due to the extent to which your minds are polluted by your ideology, its the same nonsense that leads people to think stoning people to death is reasonable.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Speaking of people thinking that stoning people to death is reasonable and polluted ideologies...

    http://stevebeckow.com/2010/11/04/sakineh-mohammadiah-ashtiani-could-be-executed-today-for-adultery/

    http://seektruthandjustice.blogspot.com/2010/08/case-of-sakineh-m-ashtiani-and-dual.html

    ReplyDelete
  8. Right cristine, sick people, sick ideologies that warp minds politically correct feminism, radical islam, nazism etc, same nonsense different packaging.

    Feminists suppress victims of female pedophiles and think its correct behavior and view objections to the movements suppression of politically incorrect victims for political and financial ends as incorrect behaviour.
    http://www.youtube.com/user/manwomanmyth#p/u/54/yPDL78e8UAs

    ReplyDelete
  9. More idiotic ravings from a silly mangina without a clue LOL :D

    ReplyDelete

Note: Only a member of this blog may post a comment.

Sociable

ShareThis