tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post3146271625913920709..comments2023-10-12T02:29:10.937-05:00Comments on the we hunted the mammoth (formerly man boobz) blogger archive: Educated women: Boner killers?Anonymoushttp://www.blogger.com/profile/00569290850910434331noreply@blogger.comBlogger109125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-13587745933523108732011-03-26T09:59:06.797-05:002011-03-26T09:59:06.797-05:00No, we just want your brains....brains...brains......No, we just want your brains....brains...brains...so we are like zombies or something.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-69832120010795421052011-03-26T05:54:49.594-05:002011-03-26T05:54:49.594-05:00Wicked Witch of the West laugh?
Sexy anaesthetis...Wicked Witch of the West laugh? <br /><br />Sexy anaesthetist? They are doctors you know and as sexy a stereotype as it goes. Sadly not true (Most of us medics are hit by the ugly stick. Too much work not enough time for exercise. I have bags under my eyes and put on weight. Also women are surprisingly not so interested in our money since we often lack it.)Avicennahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05369807472540249918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-91463110597145172292011-03-25T08:06:12.607-05:002011-03-25T08:06:12.607-05:00Mr. E-numbers:
Please know that I am deeply, deep...Mr. E-numbers:<br /><br />Please know that I am deeply, deeply sorry for using a tone that PUAs like you don't like, and for failing to be "informative" enough for you. See this face? This is my sincerely-sorry face. <br /><br />What? I often laugh uproariously when I'm being sincere.Offonoffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00617764342155764204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-49584198797840668832011-03-25T04:54:49.648-05:002011-03-25T04:54:49.648-05:00@bottle - That was bitter and uninformative, but y...@bottle - That was bitter and uninformative, but you did your best so thanks for sharing!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-53917052727140246602011-03-24T22:05:34.617-05:002011-03-24T22:05:34.617-05:00I had a rough last couple of years in graduate sch...I had a rough last couple of years in graduate school, to the point where I'm considering leaving the field in which I (finally) earned my doctorate. I've been feeling really down about that, wondering if all the blood, sweat, and tears were really worth it.<br /><br />Then I read this post, and learned that my degree is repulsive to "dating gurus" and "pick up artists." <br /><br />And you know what? It really was all worth it. <br /><br />Thanks, He-Man Woman-Haters Club!Offonoffhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00617764342155764204noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-2500731197058874302011-03-24T11:09:09.620-05:002011-03-24T11:09:09.620-05:00Actually, e-string, I would argue that women are m...Actually, e-string, I would argue that women are more used to men not listening to them. In group conversations, men often dominate the discussion, and pay little mind to what women contribute. Except, of course, when a man decides to repeat what another woman just said and everybody attributes the idea to him. The idea is brilliant just as long as it's phrased in the form of a man.<br /><br />In one-on-one conversations, many men have a habit of assuming they must know better than women about any given topic, even if the subject is menstrual cramps or changing names after marriage. We call this mansplaining.<br /><br />Oh, and if men were judged by the female end of the double-standard, the majority would be derided as whiny, ball-busting, feminazi bitches. Because the double standard sucks.Amnesiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10890145200480129970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-38819772527228278352011-03-24T06:29:18.511-05:002011-03-24T06:29:18.511-05:00Most guys do that, more so than women in fact. Oft...<i>Most guys do that, more so than women in fact. Oftentimes women are so used to men leading the conversation and entertaining them like children that they would be autistic if judged by the male end of the double-standard. Additionally, many women will leech off of wealthier men to help pay their bills.</i><br /><br />People keep telling me that but quite frankly I have never seen any of these women who are interested in any kind of money that I have. <br /><br />The gold digger is incredibly rare and quite frankly? We would probably do the same if offered a sufficiently large amount of money. I cannot say that I would not be tempted (primarily because no woman is offering me large sums of money to sleep with them. I am not that attractive and women of the world aren't that desperate... yet!)<br /><br />Hands up men, who here thinks that women who expect you to pay their bills are attractive? I am betting not many of us. It's brains and personality that always win, dating attractive supermodels with the brains of blancmange and the personality of a dead fish would be a terrible terrible thing.Avicennahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05369807472540249918noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-28383537788611230402011-03-24T00:10:29.089-05:002011-03-24T00:10:29.089-05:00No, many guys do not have that ability I find. Aft...<i>No, many guys do not have that ability I find. After the initial hi, how are you, the male just goes blank. Even trying to bring up movies, sports, computers, video games, fiction, nonfiction, television shows, the justice system, politics, religion, geography, travel, weather, and what they did that day at work does nothing to have an actual conversation.<br /></i><br /><br />1) Meet woman<br />2) ???<br />3) Get laid!Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-68664289279774671302011-03-23T23:34:44.034-05:002011-03-23T23:34:44.034-05:00No, many guys do not have that ability I find. Af...No, many guys do not have that ability I find. After the initial hi, how are you, the male just goes blank. Even trying to bring up movies, sports, computers, video games, fiction, nonfiction, television shows, the justice system, politics, religion, geography, travel, weather, and what they did that day at work does nothing to have an actual conversation.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-48615326055174951892011-03-23T23:09:15.544-05:002011-03-23T23:09:15.544-05:00I know I am wrong to expect the guy I date to be a...<i>I know I am wrong to expect the guy I date to be able to hold a decent conversation on anything, to bathe daily, to brush his teeth and hair, to make some kind of effort to support himself after turning 25...</i><br />Most guys do that, more so than women in fact. Oftentimes women are so used to men leading the conversation and entertaining them like children that they would be autistic if judged by the male end of the double-standard. Additionally, many women will leech off of wealthier men to help pay their bills.<br /><br />I guess men are just more tolerant then women of social and economic ineptitude. You're welcome.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-27481375151691084082011-03-23T21:18:16.591-05:002011-03-23T21:18:16.591-05:00@Naughty Nomad:
Your argument is assuming that wo...@Naughty Nomad:<br /><br />Your argument is assuming that women are all scheming from an early age and making a decision about how best "to get ahead." When in reality, women (and men, I assume) spend a lot of time trying to figure out what *we* like. <br /><br />What people look like is related to the things we like, and how other people who like those things generally look, it's not a genetic reflection. That's why men and women who like to get dressed up and go to clubs look one way, while men and women who like to hang out in libraries and drink coffee look another. <br /><br />If you take a person out of the library and dress them like a club kid, they will be as pretty as a club kid. And if you take a person out of the club and dress them like a library-goer, they will look like the other people in the library. See? None of these choices involve natural selection.Hide and Seekhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/05281152311161690441noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-38498489621059469032011-03-23T21:03:16.967-05:002011-03-23T21:03:16.967-05:00"i used to love smart women. still do. but th..."i used to love smart women. still do. but the problem is that the smarter the woman, and the more accomplished she is, often that means that she is more demanding and more of a pain in the ass. harder to please, harder to keep happy."<br /><br />Yes, I see what you mean. As an evil mastermind, I used to prefer the smart minions myself, but it's such a pain in the ass to get them to do what I say, they're always demanding their fair share of the spoils once I take over the world-<br /><br />Oh, you were talking about relationships not based on misguided assumptions of authority? My mistake. Just ignore me, I'm not a suspicious character at all.Amnesiahttps://www.blogger.com/profile/10890145200480129970noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-64177741851071372902011-03-23T20:44:51.031-05:002011-03-23T20:44:51.031-05:00It's how natural selection works.
Convenientl...<i>It's how natural selection works.</i><br /><br />Conveniently, when somebody uses the phrase "natural selection" while describing human behavior, I take that as a sign that I don't have to bother paying attention to them anymore.<br /><br />Thank you.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-49593393076756201882011-03-23T20:32:12.678-05:002011-03-23T20:32:12.678-05:00Hold on guys, GET REAL.
Roosh is right, albeit i...Hold on guys, GET REAL. <br /><br />Roosh is right, albeit incidentally.<br /><br />Often very attractive women do not need to rely on an education to get ahead; their looks provide. As such, less attractive females are required to 'get smart' to compete, at least in terms of value. It's how natural selection works. Beauty and brains are rare indeed.<br /><br />I'm generalizing of course, but this unfortunate correlation provides a rational justification for such a chart.Naughty Nomadhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04311724147620775476noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-19805800040083932332011-03-23T20:29:30.121-05:002011-03-23T20:29:30.121-05:00No, DarkSideCat, the original insult within "...No, DarkSideCat, the original insult within "douche" was that it was water made dirty by contact with *female* genitals. It's an insult based on contamination with femaleness.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-32232672730735721362011-03-23T20:17:33.716-05:002011-03-23T20:17:33.716-05:00Social power of the respective groups matters in t...<i>Social power of the respective groups matters in the level of hurt inflicted by an specified insult.</i><br /><br />This is something the MRAs really need to start understanding.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-54923481349005301462011-03-23T19:56:50.430-05:002011-03-23T19:56:50.430-05:00@jupiter, "douche" it is not comparable ...@jupiter, "douche" it is not comparable to the other terms you discuss. "Pussy" and "cunt" are explicit references to genitals. "Bitch" and "whore" apply to behaviors that are only punished in women or viewed as feminizing, whereas the behaviors addressed by "douche" are not ones exclusively punished in men or ones that are seen as automatically masculinized. When a woman is called a "douche", there is no suggestion that her behavior is masculine, whereas when a man is called a "bitch" it is pretty explicit that his act and the term are seen as feminizing. The same applies to the term "creepy". Neither "creepy" nor "douche" is actually a gender specific insult. Even if it is an insult that is applied at higher rates to men, it is not gendered per se, unlike the terms you cite. The term "dick" or "cock" as an insult is a specifically gendered one, however, this still does not get it to the level of being comparable. Social power of the respective groups matters in the level of hurt inflicted by an specified insult. Cracker and the n-word are not equivalent. Breeder and fag are not equivalent. Walkie-talkie and cripple are not equivalent.DarkSideCathttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14867049908238110075noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-73934057677248786032011-03-23T19:10:45.080-05:002011-03-23T19:10:45.080-05:00Saying creepy is an insult to men is just being si...Saying creepy is an insult to men is just being silly, women get called creepy too...in fact if you are constantly being called creepy, then maybe you are!<br /><br /><br />Trip and Elizabeth....don't you know that women are just so gosh darn mean now in days! I mean, if a guy is nice and shows the girl attention she needs to just give him a chance! How dare women have expectations and standards! And educated women just have too many of those things!Misanthropic_Buddhisthttps://www.blogger.com/profile/14480753442222934869noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-31119677685176413402011-03-23T18:13:11.120-05:002011-03-23T18:13:11.120-05:00I know I am wrong to expect the guy I date to be a...I know I am wrong to expect the guy I date to be able to hold a decent conversation on anything, to bathe daily, to brush his teeth and hair, to make some kind of effort to support himself after turning 25...must be that uppity edumucation I got.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-90059745149900112842011-03-23T17:34:07.023-05:002011-03-23T17:34:07.023-05:00i used to love smart women. still do. but the prob...<i>i used to love smart women. still do. but the problem is that the smarter the woman, and the more accomplished she is, often that means that she is more demanding and more of a pain in the ass. harder to please, harder to keep happy.</i><br /><br />I know, right! You give these women an education and suddenly they're demanding the same consideration as men. It's awful. Next thing you know they'll get it in their heads that they're full human beings.<br /><br />Educating women was a mistake in the first place, I say.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-28950699763206619222011-03-23T16:38:20.833-05:002011-03-23T16:38:20.833-05:00i used to love smart women. still do. but the prob...i used to love smart women. still do. but the problem is that the smarter the woman, and the more accomplished she is, often that means that she is more demanding and more of a pain in the ass. harder to please, harder to keep happy.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-46929392476339251022011-03-23T09:03:23.812-05:002011-03-23T09:03:23.812-05:00Oh, and "creepy" is used on both sexes, ...Oh, and "creepy" is used on both sexes, at least in my world.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-74275266685359726802011-03-23T09:02:35.657-05:002011-03-23T09:02:35.657-05:00""Douche." Isn't that a gender-...""Douche." Isn't that a gender-specific insult like "bitch" or "whore?" Aren't you feminists always complaining about double-standards? How is using a word like "creepy guy" or "douchy" which is a label used by women or the feminine-minded any different from a man using "gold-digging slut" or "mouthy bitch?""<br /><br />Not all feminists think douche is a good word to use as an insult, especially since it started out as a gendered insult against men, like pussy or cunt.<br /><br />No amount of "useless and unhealthy to women lol" can erase the history of the word. I'm always frustrated when I see that "explanation" because it's frankly retcon bullshit.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-7644492134651741022011-03-23T00:14:12.523-05:002011-03-23T00:14:12.523-05:00Feminism only happened because men let it
And int...<i>Feminism only happened because men let it</i><br /><br />And integration in the US only happened because the group of old white men on the Supreme Court let it. What's your point, beyond an admittedly correct acknowledgment that patriarchy is still alive and well in our culture?<br /><br />Is your point that women should bow down and be grateful to men for treating them slightly less like subhumans? Because fuck that.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-9111611851606292564.post-75692499932812633832011-03-22T23:59:25.268-05:002011-03-22T23:59:25.268-05:00Look up the definition of 'educated' and t...Look up the definition of 'educated' and then do the same for 'smart'. Note the difference.<br /><br />Needless to say, if you were a woman you'd probably be extremely wealthy. (Because a successful older man would've married you when you were young and sexy... obviously.)Unknownhttps://www.blogger.com/profile/00175617782280669777noreply@blogger.com